| |
..: Evaluation Process |
|
 |
|
|
| |
Jury - 3rd Bry-Air Awards
Prof. R.S. Agarwal, Chairman, Jury Panel
Prof. Mechnical Engineering Department
Indian Insititute of Technology, Delhi |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. S.S. Murthy
Prof. Department of Mechnical Engg.
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras |
|
|
Mr. Sunil Gupta
President - ASHRAE India Chapter
Gupta Consultants & Associates |
The jury adopted a matrix approach for evaluation of the
nominations.
The Jury members reviewed every nomination and rated them
independently first and then discussed details of each
to validate their evaluation. The whole process was transparent
and decisions unanimous.
|
|
| |
| 2 |
| |
Criteria for Student Category : Innovative Project
|
|
| |
| » |
Originality/Innovation |
| » |
Energy Saving |
| » |
Environment Friendly |
|
|
| |
| 2 |
| |
Criteria for Evaluation for Product Design :
|
|
| |
| » |
Ease of Manufacturing & Maintenance |
| » |
Innovation |
| » |
Energy Saving |
| » |
Environment Friendly |
| » |
Relevance to India and Potential for Replicability |
|
|
| Prerequisite for "Excellence in Product Design": Product has to be commercialized |
| |
| 2 |
| |
Criteria for Systems Design :
|
|
| |
| » |
Originality of Idea & Uniqueness |
| » |
Energy Saving |
| » |
Environment Friendly |
| » |
Cost Effectiveness |
| » |
Relevance to India and Potential for Replicability |
|
|
| Prerequisite for "Excellence in System Design": Commissioned and Tested |
| 2 |
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
| |
|
|
| |
Jury Panel - 2nd Bry-Air Awards
| » |
Dr. S. Devotta, Chairman, Jury Panel
Director
NEERI |
| » |
Prof. R.S. Agarwal
Emeritus Chair Professor (Mech. Engg.)
IIT, Delhi |
| » |
Mr. Hiru M. Jhangiani
Editor
Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Journal |
| » |
Mr. Ramesh Paranjey
Fellow ASHRAE, USA |
| » |
Mr. Richie Mittal
President, ASHRAE India Chapter
Roots Air Systems Pvt. Ltd. |
| » |
Mr. V. Krishnan
President, ASHRAE Western Indian Chapter
Dynacraft Air Controls |
| » |
Mr. Satish Iyengar
President, ISHRAE HQ
Service Consultant |
The jury adopted a matrix approach for evaluation of the
nominations. A matrix aproach was adopted by the jury
to is adopted.
The Jury members reviewed every nomination and rated them
independently first and then discussed details of each
to validate their evaluation. The whole process was transparent
and decisions unanimous.
|
|
| |
Prerequisite for "Excellence in Product Design": Product has to be commercialized
|
|
| |
| Criteria for Further Evaluation |
| » |
Ease of Manufacturing & Maintenance |
| » |
Innovation |
| » |
Energy Saving |
| » |
Environment Friendly |
| » |
Benefit to Society |
|
|
| 2 |
| |
Prerequisite for "Excellence in System Design": Commissioned and Tested
|
|
| |
| Criteria |
| » |
Originality of Idea & Uniqueness |
| » |
Energy Saving |
| » |
Environment Friendly |
| » |
Cost Effectiveness |
| » |
Benefit to Society
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
| |
|
|
| |
Jury Panel - 1st Bry-Air Awards
| » |
Dr. Rajeshwar Malhotra, Chairman, Jury Panel
Managing Director
Spirotech Heat Exchanger Pvt. Ltd. |
| » |
Dr. S. Devotta
Director
NEERI |
| » |
Mr. S.S. Murthy
Professor Mechnical Engineering
IIT |
| » |
Ms. Mili Majumdar
Fellow & Area Convenor
TERI |
| » |
Mr. Kapil Mehrotra
President, ASHRAE India Chapter |
| » |
Mr. G. Anand Kumar
President, ISHRAE Headquarters |
The jury adopted a matrix approach for evaluation of the
nominations. A matrix aproach was adopted by the jury
to is adopted.
The Jury members reviewed every nomination and rated them
independently first and then discussed details of each
to validate their evaluation. The whole process was transparent
and decisions unanimous.
|
|
| |
Prerequisite for "Excellence in Product Design": Product has to be commercialized
|
|
| |
| Criteria for Further Evaluation |
| » |
Capable for being replicated i.e. Manufacturing Base |
| » |
Market reach and share in Indian
market |
| » |
Exports |
| » |
Competition |
| » |
Innovatation |
| » |
Patents |
| » |
Energy saving |
| » |
Environment friendly |
|
|
|
| |
Prerequisite for "Excellence in System Design": Commissioned and Tested
|
|
| |
| Criteria |
| » |
Trend setting |
| » |
Uniqueness |
| » |
Energy Saving |
| » |
Environment Friendly |
| » |
Relevent to indian conditions
* Temp Design Suitable to Indian Company
* Power Break Down
* Shortage of Water
* Quality of Water |
| » |
Completeness of system |
|
|
| |
|
|
